Maryland Courts Logo

OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Maryland Judiciary
2011-D Commerce Park Drive
Annapolis, Maryland 21401
410-260-1488

For Immediate Release CONTACT:

Angelita Plemmer
Terri Bolling
(410) 260-1488



Maryland Access to Justice Commission First in Nation to Study
Actual Costs Associated with a Right to Counsel in Civil Cases
Detailed plan estimates$106.6 million needed to address critical legal needs in cases involving
shelter, sustenance, safety, health or custody


(ANNAPOLIS, Md. – May 24, 2011) Other states have proposed “civil right to counsel” plans, but the Maryland Access to Justice Commission has become the first in the nation to take a bold step further by envisioning how the state could administer such a right, and how much that plan could cost.

The right to be represented by a lawyer applies primarily to criminal cases and does not apply in most civil matters. A “civil right to counsel,” also referred to as Civil Gideon, extends the right to be represented by a lawyer in civil cases that deal with the most basic of human needs, such as shelter, sustenance, safety, health or child custody.

In a new report, the Maryland Access to Justice Commission notes that only about 22 percent of the civil legal needs of poor and low-income Maryland residents are being met. The Commission estimates that each year in Maryland, nearly 350,000 people appear in court proceedings involving basic human needs cases. These Marylanders, mostly individuals and families with low incomes, come to court without the benefit of counsel and usually without help from the existing voluntary legal services system.

The report, “Implementing a Civil Right to Counsel in Maryland,” starts from the principle that “low-income Marylanders should have a right to counsel at public expense … where basic human needs are at stake, such as those involving shelter, sustenance, safety, health or child custody.” The report explores how much it could cost to implement the plan, taking into account factors such as the kinds of cases this right to counsel should include, compensation rates for attorneys, income-eligibility criteria and quality assurance standards.

“The Commission asked the unthinkable question – what might it cost to provide meaningful access to counsel if that right to civil counsel was to be established,” said retired Maryland Court of Appeals Judge Irma S. Raker, who chairs the Maryland Access to Justice Commission. “In a report two years ago, we recommended that Maryland should support the principle that low-income residents should have the right to counsel at public expense in basic human needs cases. Now, we are projecting what that public expense might be. This is a tough issue, but one that must be addressed and resolved if a state wants to create a viable program.”

The estimated cost for a program that assures lawyers for critical civil cases is $106.6 million, the Commission notes in the report. The Commission also urges that the creation of a right to counsel initiative should not divert existing funding away from the current civil legal services delivery system, which includes approximately 35 organizations in Maryland providing some legal services in civil matters. The report tries to envision the amount of additional funding required to fulfill the mandate of a civil right to counsel in these critical types of cases.

“Implementing a Civil Right to Counsel in Maryland,” is part of the Commission’s latest annual report, which was published this month. It’s available online through the Commission’s website at http://mdcourts.gov/mdatjc/pdfs/annualreport2010.pdf.

The annual report also includes work produced by the Commission during the year including: 1) a summary of lessons learned from the Commission’s year-long public inquiry process including ten regional listening events; 2) a white paper expounding on the important role that attorneys’ fees play in providing access to representation for low-income individuals and proposing legislation to provide attorneys’ fees for state constitutional claims; 3) posters developed by the Commission as part of the public education campaign “My Laws, My Courts, My Maryland;”and 4) proposed rules to support the practice of limited scope representation in the State. The proposed limited scope rules are currently being considered by the Maryland Court of Appeals Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure.

The Maryland Access to Justice Commission was created by the Maryland Judiciary to improve and expand all people’s access to the state’s civil justice system. The goal of the Commission is to enhance the quality of justice in civil legal matters for persons who encounter barriers when dealing with the courts or trying to solve legal problems.

 

###